September
- October 2001
UCITA
Stalls, Giving Opponents Hope
By Chris McManes
After a quick start
in 2000, state action on the Uniform Computer Information Transaction
Act (UCITA) has stalled this year, and that's good news for IEEE-USA.
In
1999, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State
Laws (NCCUSL) developed UCITA as a draft
model law
that
would regulate transactions in
intangible goods such as computer software, online databases and other
information products in digital form. The complex 344-page model law
attempts to modernize the laws that govern commerce in each of the 50
U.S. states, many of which
are outdated when it comes to regulating information technology.
Maryland and
Virginia signed amended UCITA
legislation into law in 2000. This
year, 18 other jurisdictions either considered or introduced UCITA:
Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas,
Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, Maine, New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode
Island, Wisconsin, Washington, New Jersey and the District of
Columbia. It didn't pass anywhere. On the other hand, Iowa, West
Virginia and North Carolina adopted "bomb
shelter" legislation, which bars enforcement of UCITA laws
approved in another state.
"The trend has
been stopped," said Dan Fisher, a member of IEEE-USA's
Intellectual Property Committee who drafted approved amendments to
UCITA legislation in Maryland and Virginia. "I'm pleased, but I
think we've got to repeal it in those two states. I think it's fatally
flawed."
Software industry
trade groups and computer heavyweights such as Compaq, AOL and Microsoft
favor UCITA legislation. IEEE-USA is joined in its opposition to UCITA
by 26 state Attorneys General, the insurance industry, libraries,
consumer protection groups, and large technology users, including
Boeing and Phillips Petroleum. While the opposing camps agree that new
laws are needed to govern computer information transactions, opponents
argue that UCITA provides unusual advantages to those who sell or
lease software, while crippling consumer rights.
"UCITA
proponents were well organized early, and were able to convince
Virginia and Maryland legislators to pass their legislation rather
than be characterized as 'high-tech unfriendly,'" IEEE-USA
President Ned Sauthoff said. "But as soon as state legislators
started hearing from both sides, it became obvious to them that UCITA
was not a clear-cut issue, and that there are many fundamental
consumer rights concerns that need to be addressed."
IEEE-USA opposes
UCITA for many reasons. Among them are concerns that UCITA would make legally
enforceable license provisions allowing software makers to remotely
turn off computer programs in a contract dispute; prohibit legal
reverse engineering of software to promote the advancement of
scientific learning, technological improvement and the public
interest; ban an individual from publishing an unfavorable review of a
software program; and relieve software vendors of liability for
selling software with significant known defects.
IEEE-USA formalized
its opposition to UCITA in a February
2000 position statement.
Fears of a UCITA
steamroller have faded as IEEE-USA and others have worked to raise the
awareness of state legislators about the law's fundamental problems.
The American Bar Association (ABA) considered a proposal to oppose
UCITA in August, but instead formed a committee to evaluate the law.
NCCUSL agreed to suspend efforts to pass the legislation in any state
until the ABA's recommendations could be considered.
NCCUSL's UCITA
Standby Committee has proposed a meeting to consider amendments and
"to address concerns and reach consensus among all interested
groups." That meeting is tentatively set for Washington on 16 -
18 November in Washington, D.C.
"The failure of
UCITA proponents to secure passage in any
state so far this year, coupled with the ABA's decision to take a
critical look at UCITA, signals a dim future for the legislation, at
least in its present form," Sauthoff said. "That's good news
for software consumers and computer programmers."
Chris McManes is
PR/Marketing Coordinator at IEEE-USA in Washington, D.C.
|