IEEE


 

PP Home

Update Sign-up

IEEE-USA

Eye on Washington

Contact Us

 


MAY - JUNE 2001


Reader Feedback:
 
Give us a piece of your mind...

 

…Is "Kaizen" the Answer?

Masaaki Imai’s book sounds interesting. According to Mr. McClure, the book states that managers have difficulty reasoning problems in a conference room and should go to "gemba" – the area where the work gets done – to understand the problem before they can tackle it.  That is what I got from the brief description in the article. 

Mr. Imai must know the works of W. Edwards Deming, who spent years in Japan just after WWII. Deming’s work there produced astounding results based on his famous Fourteen Points among other things.  The following is excerpted from Chapter 2 of Out of the Crisis by W. Edwards Deming:

"Point 14:  Put everybody in the company to work to accomplish the transformation. The transformation is everybody’s job."

One Deming theory that was put to the test long before Imai’s "kaizen" came about was to empower each person in the plant down to the line worker with the responsibility of not only suggesting changes but implementing changes that would increase production, sales, etc., based on their expertise and work area (as suggested by Point 14).  The reason behind this is that the work area manager is most likely not as familiar with what is occurring on the assembly line on a day-to-day basis as the line worker is.  This turned out to be a tremendous help to many Japanese companies, and as I remember, especially the Japanese auto industry. 

This was just one of many ways W. Edwards Deming helped Japanese management. The Deming Method is still taught today to managers across the United States, in courses called "Total Quality Management," among others.


— Eric R. Schaper
IEEE Member
Systems Engineer
Fuji Medical Systems

******************

…On Engineers and Pre-College Education

About involving engineers in pre-college education, my answer is a resounding YES. My wife was an elementary and high school teacher. I was associated with the University of Illinois for many years, doing most of my teaching while getting my MSEE, and my wife continued to keep in touch with all the local schooling while our three children were going through their paces. I have done high school science fair judging and she has done much work with the local schools and the School Board.

As you might guess, we are enthusiasts when it comes to offering as much as possible to the kids. I have found that very few of them have much idea of what constitutes an engineering career, and most of them are interested in finding out. One of the best ways for them to get this information is to have contact with a reasonably literate working or retired engineer. Anything the IEEE can do to get engineers to speak to school groups or act as mentors for students interested in finding out about engineering will be a great plus.

Please keep us posted on what is happening. The future of our country depends on having the best possible people working for us in jobs they enjoy.

—Dr. Robert S. Smith
IEEE Life Member
Silver Spring, MD

******************

Some time ago when one of my engineers asked if it was at all possible that he teaches a class one afternoon a week, I gladly agreed. Here is why:

Engineers should not only get involved in pre-college education but even more so in full-blown university lecturing. I am from Europe where academic credentials present a barrier toward this, since most engineers are neither professors nor do they hold a Ph.D. Why? Because most want to plunge into the hands-on world as soon as they can. They might forego an academic achievement that society highly regards, but they learn skills and learn about potential pitfalls to a degree where a pure academic cannot compete.

Do universities place enough emphasis on the business side of things? Absolutely not. The few years a professor may have spent in industry are typically encapsulated in a high level R&D area. However, one will only learn the ropes when exposed on a day-to-day basis to production issues, costs, budgets, board room tussles when the going gets tough, and serious grilling by bankers.

The same goes for practical design. Most of us were taught, for example, to split grounds in systems so digital and analog sections do not interfere. The only problem with this is that it won’t work in real life with today’s high-bandwidth technologies. Hard-core mixed-signal engineers know this because they suffered a bloody nose here and there. Even if their designs somehow worked, the sobering lesson often came when it blew the EMI certification a couple of weeks before the critical trade show.

This experience-based knowledge can only be passed on to the next generation by the folks who have had the experiences.

— Joerg Schulze-Clewing
IEEE Member
Cameron Park, CA

******************

…On Electronic Voting Technology

E-voting is working in Delaware, where all ballots are cast on direct recording electronic machines.  The size of the state offers less of an impediment cost-wise, but based on voter numbers and taxpayer share of the cost, it would seem that every state could do it.  While engineers make the technology available, politicians set the policy to utilize whatever technology they feel they can justify financially. Just look to "The First State" to see the application of modern, available technology to a basic right.

—Bill Simpson
IEEE Member
New Castle, Del.

******************

 

PP2

Feb_PP_bottom.jpg (11265 bytes)

PP3