|
October
- November 2001
Engineering
Trends
Terrorist Aftermath
— Rethinking the Need for Face-to-Face Meetings
by
Todd Yuzuriha
I was in the air on my
way to a meeting on September 11th when the pilot's voice came over the
intercom. "We've been instructed by the FAA to ground all
aircraft," he announced as he turned the plane back toward the
airport we had just left.
In the days and weeks
following the atrocious attacks of that day, companies across America — even
around the world — have
been forced to rethink some tried-and-true business practices. One of
them involves face-to-face meetings.
The Trend Had
Already Begun
Even before 11
September, distance was becoming less relevant in our work lives.
Several high-tech tools have made it possible for us to communicate and
collaborate from virtually anywhere. As a result, we have not had to
rely so much on face-to-face meetings to get together. As we move forward,
the challenge will be to balance business and technology, making sure we
know when we need to meet in person and when we can meet
electronically. We will need to consider making e-conferencing a
business-as-usual practice.
Deciding How to
Meet
Electronic meetings
are great when discussions will focus on factual tasks or keeping up to
date on project status. Face-to-face meetings are beneficial when
emotions need to be conveyed — when
resolving conflicts, selling products or services, or celebrating a
project success. Face-to-face meetings seem
necessary when emotional stakes are high, whether for a pleasurable
interaction or a tough one. Most other meetings might be just as
effective held remotely.
Tools to Improve
Electronic Interaction
Phones and e-mail will
continue to be the common forms of electronic communications. These
technologies have become so entrenched in our workplace and are so
convenient that they will likely always make sense for electronic
communication.
But other tools exist to
enhance electronic communication. Video is at the top of that list. If
your company has or plans to install video conferencing equipment, take
the time to check out its features. This newer technology can
effectively substitute for some of your face-to-face meetings,
without losing all personal contact.
A more informal
alternative to video is the PC camera. These inexpensive tools can be
purchased for around $100 and are extremely simple to use. The only real
drawback is that both parties communicating must have a PC camera, and firewall-happy Internet connections
to make them useable and secure.
As we continue to
conduct our work in a changing economic and political environment, it is
important to balance business and technology to find the most effective
ways to get our jobs done.

What Do You
Think?
Is e-conferencing a viable alternative for
you?
We
want to hear from you. Please send your thoughts, ideas and
suggestions to todaysengineer@ieee.org.
Be sure to include your name, residence city, and IEEE
membership level.
|
Todd Yuzuriha is the author of
How
to Succeed as an Engineer: A Practical Guide to Enhance Your Career. For more
information, go to www.engineeringsuccess.com. |