|
01.12
IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference
By George F. McClure
In late October 2011, Scientists, engineers,
technology professionals, academics,
foundations, government and non-government
organizations, and individuals engaged in
humanitarian work gathered at the inaugural
IEEE Global Humanitarian
Technology Conference in Seattle to present and
discuss solutions for present and future
humanitarian needs. Participants from all over
the world attended and participated in the
program of tutorials, invited talks, panels,
technical sessions, exhibits, networking, and
social activities.
Following the Conference theme
of “Technology for the benefit of humanity,”
topics included:
-
Health, Medical Technology and
Telemedicine
-
Disaster Warning/Response
-
Water Planning, Availability and
Quality
-
Power for Off-Grid Users
-
Power Infrastructure/
Renewable/Sustainable Energy
-
Connectivity and Communications
Technologies (data/voice) for Remote Locations
-
Educational Technologies
-
Agricultural Technologies
-
Humanitarian Challenges and
Opportunities
This first-ever global
humanitarian technology conference attracted 222
registered attendees to hear a program that
included over 110 papers. Conference papers will
be accessible through IEEE Xplore early next
year.
The Global Need
Statistics speak to the need:
Roughly 1.6 billion people, one out of every
four people on the planet, do not have regular
access to electricity. In sub-Saharan Africa,
excluding South Africa, 75% of households or 550
million people have no access to network
electricity.
In
South Asia, in places such as India, Pakistan
and Bangladesh, 700 million people or 50% of the
overall population and 90% of the rural
population are not on the grid. Based on the
business as usual scenarios, the International
Energy Agency predicts that 1.4 billion people
will still lack access to electricity in 2030.
In Haiti, destruction of the
water system in the 2010 earthquake led to an
outbreak of cholera acknowledged by the United
Nations.
Tutorials Focused on Key
Aspects
Three parallel half-day
tutorials preceded the conference. They were
“Affordable Energy Solutions for Developing
Communities,” by Robin Podmore, co-chair of the
IEEE Community Solutions Initiative (slogan:
Energy solutions for the world’s poorest
communities)); “Village-Level Renewable Energy
Projects for the Developing World,” by Michel
Maupoux; and” Systems Thinking and Village
Development,” by John Coonrod.
As noted, a problem in many
underdeveloped areas is lack of electric power.
Lots of pro bono work has resulted in open
source designs that can be readily replicated
and are scalable.
Sponsored by IEEE’s Humanitarian
Technology Challenge, Power and Energy Society,
and Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society, the
Community Solutions Initiative was formed to
meet these needs. Keys are developing extremely
affordable open-source electric energy solutions
for developing country communities, supporting
locally-owned micro-business development, and
reaching a significant portion of the un-served
electricity population in each country where
deployed.
For Haiti, a “yellow package”
battery kit was developed providing 18
ampere-hours of electricity, using a 12-volt
battery. The battery kits can be recharged from
a 1,470 watt solar photovoltaic trailer. A
sustainable business model has been developed in
which locals rent out the battery kits, which
can provide lighting for 10 foot X 16 foot
homes. The homeowner does not buy anything, but
pays a fee for service. Non-Governmental
Organizations (NGOs) pay the capital cost. The
battery kits can be recharged in three hours
after they have been depleted to half-capacity,
at a cost of $5.00. A light stick with 1/5 watt
power consumption enables a user to read a
newspaper in the dark. Ninety-six homes can use
light sticks for a charge of one dollar per
month.
IEEE is cooperating in a program with Sirona
Cares, a non-profit already operating in
Haiti, to
provide basic electricity in the homes of one
million Haitians using this sustainable
business model. Station operators get a
percentage of the retail collections.
Photovoltaic panels generate electricity at a
cost of $1.50 per watt. Experience has shown
that PV panels supplied by the government are
often stolen, but they are left intact where the
villagers are involved.
A total of
21 solar trailers are planned for Haiti, at
a cost of $300,000. A solar suitcase has been
developed to provide lighting for medical
clinics.
Thus far, 240 battery kits have
been deployed in homes. Pride of ownership is
shown in that all bills are paid on time and
there is no theft of equipment. The cost for
service is about $10.50 per month for
electricity and lighting.
Bicycle-powered generators can
be pedaled comfortably at a 40-watt output
level.
Affordable wind turbines, useful
for energy poverty alleviation, were
described by Dr. Henry Louie. Zambia was
used as a case study. The population is 12
million, with 25 percent having electricity. But
in rural communities where 8 million live only 4
percent have access to electricity. Half of the
rural population have electronic devices, such
as cell phones or hand-cranked radios. A
700-watt wind turbine with 5 foot blades has
been built and tested using an open source
design that can be replicated in-country. Parts
cost in the U.S. is $1,343. Where wood
availability is limited, 4-foot blades can be
used instead of five foot. A smaller version
generates 30 watts to serve a village of 1,000
people. In Zambia, the cost to charge cell
phones is about 1,000 times the U.S.cost — 20
cents to 30 cents per charge, but the enterprise
can support social businesses in-country, both
manufacturing and service. A high site location
is required to get enough wind (at 100 inches,
25 miles per hour was experienced). A problem is
limited availability of rare earth magnets.
Experience shows that a 5 to 7 Tip Speed Ratio (TSR)
is best to extract the most wind energy. Future
plans include a 100 watt wind turbine.
Zambia has a 15 percent import
tax on windmills. Micro-loans for local
enterprises are usually $500 or less.
An open
source solar refrigerator-freezer
was developed using ammonia/calcium chloride or
ammonia/water in an absorption cycle as the
refrigerant, without electricity.
A third choice, ammonia/lithium bromide,
requires a vacuum.
Applications include storing vaccines and
anti-venom for clinics as well as for ice to
preserve fish (in Haiti).
Solar concentrator choices included Fresnel
lenses (from old projection TVs), mirror-lined
satellite dishes, and Scheffler reflectors (used
for solar cookstoves).
A unit producing 10 pounds of ice per day can be
built for $500.
Larger capacity units are desirable, but $8,000
to $10,000 is considered too expensive for local
use. A fishing association in Haiti numbers
around 110 people.
They need to preserve their catches for the
once-per-week market day.
With cooling but without freezing, fish will
keep for five days.Consider the Application
Before Doing the Designn
Lessons learned: The latest
technology is likely not the right solution,
because it may be hard for the locals to
maintain over the long haul. Involving the local
population gives a sense of “buy-in” and
ownership; more care will be exercised in
preserving the assets this way than if a
faceless government or NGO is the provider. A
scalable business model that is sustainable with
local folks in the loop is best.
Cathy Leslie, PE, executive
director of Engineers Without Borders-USA,
mentioned two contrasting projects: in
Guatemala, locals took ownership of a water
system project, and it succeeded. But a solar
system was installed in Tanzania that locals
could not maintain. Her top ten tips for
projects in underdeveloped areas to succeed:
-
Keep the design simple
-
Start small
-
Involve the local community
-
Use local materials, local supply
chains, and power
-
Select appropriate technology,
including location for the project
-
Use multidisciplinary team
partners, to be successful
-
Communicate
-
Consider unintended consequences
(does the project reveal a need for more schools
and teachers?)
-
Monitor and evaluate progress —
the learning curve may take five years
-
Share lessons learned.
A Flatter World
In his
closing remarks, 2012 IEEE President Gordon
Day called for IEEE to take on the challenge of
Global Electrification and announced that would
be a top priority for his term as president. He
noted the role of the Rural Electrification
Administration (REA) in the United States, where
only 11 percent of farms had electricity in
1935, but nearly all farms had electricity
twenty years later. The mission of the REA was
later extended to include wider telephone
service. The result was a flatter world than
had ever existed. But still, over 1.4 billion
people worldwide — 21 percent of the world’s
population according to the International Energy
Agency — are off the grid — they don’t have
access to electricity. The problem is most acute
in Africa. With current policies, and population
growth, by 2030, 15 percent of the population
will lack electricity access, but that will
still be 1.2 billion people.
An Early Humanitarian
Technology Challenge
In June of 2009 at the National
Academy of Sciences, the Humanitarian Technology
Challenge solution teams were formed. In the
simplest terms the overall challenge was to find
better ways to apply technology to alleviate
human suffering in the world. The HTC was
initially sponsored by the IEEE and the United
Nations Foundation. For the last two years the
IEEE has been the sole sponsor.
After a careful review of issues
for people living in the poorest parts of the
world, the Reliable Electricity Solution Team
chaired by Butch Shadwell set out to design and
build a prototype power system that:
1.
Would take a first cut at creating
electrical solutions to these issues, and
2.
Act as a field experiment to gather more
firsthand information about the problem domain.
Two systems for off-the-grid
lighting, using photovoltaic panels to provide
300 watts for high-output LED lamps, were
installed for schools in Nicaragua earlier this
year.
A similar system installed in
Kenya in December 2011 is over-designed in order
to meet the full objectives of this first phase
of field experiments. Since it is anticipated
that many users will be illiterate in any
language, the system was designed to be user
obvious. That is, that someone with no
familiarity with electricity could intuitively
put the system together and make it operate
without danger of damaging any components. To
that end the system employs much more internal
management intelligence than would normally be
expected in a system of this size. All
subsystems are continually monitored and
remedial actions are automated as much as
possible. The system also has a low power
consuming internal data logger that can record
environment conditions, system performance and
user behavior, for later analysis toward a more
perfect second iteration of the design.
Special features of the power
control unit:
1.
All loads have auto-resetting circuit
protection.
2.
Programmatic control over all loads, with
current sense.
3.
Connectors can be powered down when the
load is disconnected.
4.
Pictographs for user indicators.
5.
No exposed wiring, and batteries are
encapsulated.
6.
Many more special features …
A
Facebook page with comments about the
excitement of villagers who have electric lights
for the first time is found at [Butch Shadwell
is wearing a straw hat in the first photo.]
The origins of the
Humanitarian Fund
Past IEEE President Lew Terman recalled how
humanitarian efforts were organized and how this
conference was kicked off.
"By the
end of my presidency in 2008, during which I had
had a focus on IEEE having greater focused and
coordinated involvement in efforts involving
humanitarian activity, we felt a growing need
for having a major conference to attract people
from around the world to listen to talks,
exchange ideas, results, learn, and generally to
interact and network within the humanitarian
technology sphere. There is a lot of effort
going on around the world, but it is scattered,
disparate, and communication between those
involved is hit or miss. While there have been
scattered conferences, to our knowledge there
was no major conference with the goal of pulling
a large international audience together and
covering a wide range of the important topics,
as is done with numerous IEEE Society and
Council flagship conferences. What humanitarian
conferences we knew of had been one-offs, with
no year-to-year repetition, something which IEEE
had shown to be a key element in continued
progress within a given technical area.
"I was contacted in late 2009 by a member of the
Seattle Section who wanted to have an
international humanitarian technology
conference. These discussions resulted in the
Seattle Section and Region 6 deciding to hold a
conference and being willing to accept the
financial responsibility for it. This was a
gutsy move, since the financial model was
expected to be quite different than the typical
IEEE conference, where there is funding to
support attendees, and there was a substantial
chance for a significant financial hit. Much
effort was spent on getting donations from
various organizations; the IEEE HTF of the
Foundation was one. The others are listed in the
proceedings of the conference.
"A team was assembled in early 2010, which
allowed only about 18 months to pull conference
together, a relatively short time, especially
for a new conference. However, with a lot of
emails burning up the internet and weekly or
biweekly telecons, it all came together in
astonishingly effective fashion, and a lot of
credit is due to the hard work of the
organizers.
"Of
particular note was the need for publicity. The
humanitarian space is not a single coherent
community, as is normally found in the various
technical communities in the IEEE fields of
interest, with databases of conference
attendees, published authors, and previous
presentations. In the absence of such databases,
making sure the right people knew about the
conference was of prime importance, and a
successful effort to reach out was carried out,
with skillful use of social networking and other
modern means of communication."
IEEE Support for Disaster
Relief
Two major disasters occurred in
2010, an earthquake in Haiti and floods in
Pakistan. In both cases, IEEE established
special funds for voluntary contributions for
relief.
The Haiti Fund for relief after
the January 12, 2010 earthquake amounted to
$105,298.09, with IEEE contributing a match to
the first $50,000.
The Pakistan Fund for 2010 flood
relief and reconstruction totaled $105,017, with
IEEE contributing a match to the first $50,000.
About a fifth of the country’s inhabitants were
affected.
The IEEE Foundation has awarded,
to date, the following grants from the:
IEEE Haiti Education and
Professional Development Rebuilding Fund:
1.
1. $50,000 to IEEE Power & Energy
Society's Community Solutions Initiative for
"Community Entrepreneur Solar Electricity for
Rural Haiti"
2.
$7,070 of the $17,000 grant to Illinois
Institute of Technology: IIT Empowering Haiti
for "Solar Transformation for Haitian Education"
(the other $9,930 came from the IEEE Foundation
General Fund)
Another grant is pending.
IEEE Pakistan Engineering
Educational and Professional Development
Rebuilding Fund
1.
$45,000 to UET Peshawar for "Project for
Flood Affected Areas Nowshera District"
2. $35,000 to Allama Iqbal Open University
for "Computer Based Training in Regional Center
D.G Khan for Flood Affected Areas in Southern
Punjab"
3. $15,000
to Air University for "Support Schools and
Colleges of Flood Affected areas of District
Rajan Pur (near DG Khan)" Finally, Dr. Tony Marjoram,
retired recently from the United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization, described the work of UNESCO and
its first-ever report on engineering, done under
his leadership.
Engineering is so successful and
pervasive, however, that it can be taken for
granted and is often overlooked by the public
and policy-makers. At the same time, fewer young
people in many countries are going into
engineering, and there are worldwide concerns
about declining human capacity and the
consequences for poverty reduction and
sustainable development. Reports of shortages of
engineers in key sectors are common. This is
compounded by the brain-drain of engineers from
developing countries and out of [the practice
of] engineering. These issues are linked and
provide an opportunity for change: the public
perception of engineering reflects the changing
needs for engineering, and need for engineering
to change, and young people are concerned about
global issues and attracted to engineering as a
means to address them [1].
The full 392-page report is
accessible at
online.
Acknowledgements
The assistance of Lew Terman,
Moshe Kam, Gordon Day, Ed Perkins, Paul Kostek
and Butch Shadwell in the preparation of this
article is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1]
Engineering: Issues and Challenges for
Development
(First UNESCO International Engineering Report),
found online at:
http://portal.unesco.org/science/en/ev.php-URL_ID=6991&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
George F. McClure is
Technology Policy editor and member of
Communications Committee for IEEE-USA.
Comments may be submitted to
todaysengineer@ieee.org.
home
|