|
09.10
Are We Beginning To See The
Light?
Public and Parents Buy into the Need To Ramp Up
Math and Science Education, But Most Still Think
Their Local Schools Are Doing Fine
By
Jean Johnson,
Jon Rochkind
and
Amber OttAmericans are convinced that math and
science skills are crucial for the future, with
strong majorities who say there will be more
jobs and college opportunities for students with
those skills, according to a new Public Agenda
survey. But while there's
broad support from parents and the general
public for K-12 national standards, more than
half of parents (52%) say the math and science
their child is getting in school is "fine
as it is."
These are just some of many
surprising realities facing science, technology,
engineering and math (STEM) education in public
schools, according to "Are We Beginning to See
the Light?", a new Public Agenda survey
exploring the views of more than 1,400
individuals nationwide, including 646 parents of
children grades K-12. The national survey was
underwritten by the
GE Foundation.
Preparing For Tomorrow's Jobs
While only 3 in 10 Americans see
a demand for science and math-focused jobs in
the current economy, 84% agree that
there will be a lot more jobs in the future that
require math and science skills. And 9 in 10
Americans say studying advanced math and science
is
useful even for students who don’t pursue a STEM
career. Additionally, 88% of the public
agrees that
students with advanced math and science skills
will have an advantage when it comes to college
opportunities.
Overall, the general public
favors a
“national curriculum” as one way of
improving STEM education: 8 in 10 Americans say
establishing a national curriculum in math would
improve STEM education, with more than half
(53%) saying it would improve it “a lot.” And
78% say the same about a national curriculum in
science, with 48% saying it would improve it “a
lot.”
"Giving today's students a world
class science and math education is the key to
maintaining our country's economic prowess,”
said Alan Leshner, Chief Executive Officer of
The American Association for the Advancement of
Science (AAAS). “Parents are beginning to
envision the opportunities for their children in
the STEM fields, and I am especially heartened
by their receptivity to having high national
standards in these critical subjects.”
Strategies for Improvement
At the same time, parents agree
with the general public on the value of STEM
education.
Most parents surveyed want their own children to
take advanced math and science courses in high
school (60% and 54% respectively). Parents
would also like to see their local schools
spend more money on up-to-date and well-equipped
science labs (70%), more equipment for
hands-on learning (69%) and more equipment to
help students learn computer and technology
skills (68%). A plurality of parents with
children in grades 6-12 say they want to see
more emphasis in their child’s school on STEM
topics such as computer programming (65%),
basic engineering principles (52%), and
statistics and probability (49%).
“The public is open to many
different strategies for improving STEM
education, and they’re enthusiastic about the
overall goal, but much more has to be done to
help them understand what’s needed for kids in
their local schools to have a world-class
science and math education,” said
Jean Johnson, director of
Education Insights at Public Agenda. “The
problem is particularly acute in science. Many
parents don’t realize the importance of starting
children in science early on. Many think it can
easily wait until high school.”
National Competitiveness
There is a growing body of
research suggesting Americans are
falling behind in math and science
education. U.S. students
rank 25th in math and 21st in science skills
internationally, according to a recent OECD
report, and the
2007 ACT College Readiness Report points out
that only 43% of graduating seniors are ready
for college math and 27% are ready for college
science.
Last November, President Obama
launched an “Educate to Innovate” campaign to
improve the participation and performance of
America’s students in STEM fields. "Are We
Beginning to See the Light" provides insight
into how Americans perceive the problem and how
they identify solutions that could help solve
the nation’s STEM education problem.
For example, 71% of those
surveyed believe in
having local businesses provide internships and
other business partnership programs, so high
school students can gain practical job skills.
While parents and the public
understand the value of STEM skills, there’s
still a gap between the way the leaders and
public see the problem.
Few Americans think it is absolutely essential
for students to understand advanced sciences
like physics (28%) and advanced math like
calculus (26%). When it comes to their own
child,
few parents want more emphasis on advanced math
and science like physics (42%) and calculus
(42%). Additionally,
nearly 7 in 10 Americans say science can wait
until middle and high school.
Methodology and Full Survey
Results
"Are We Beginning to See the
Light?" is based on a nationally-representative
sample of more 1,406 adults, with oversamples to
achieve interview with 646 parents of children
grades K-12. Telephone interviews were conducted
from 1- 15 December 2009, and respondents had
the choice of completing the interview in
English or Spanish. The margin of error for the
report is plus or minus 2.8 percentage points.
However, it is higher when comparing subgroups
or question items that weren't asked of all
respondents.
Survey data were weighted to (1)
adjust for the fact that not all survey
respondents were selected with the same
probability, and (2) account for gaps in
coverage and nonresponse biases in the survey
frame. Weights were applied to balance region,
race, Hispanic ethnicity, income and marital
status.
Results of less than 0.5 percent
are signified by an asterisk. Results of zero
are signified by a dash. Responses may not
always total 100 percent due to rounding.
Combining answer categories may produce slight
discrepancies between numbers in these survey
results and numbers in the report.

Comments may be submitted to
todaysengineer@ieee.org.
|