|
05.10
Reverse Innovation: Changing the Path of Global Development
By John R. Platt
Where will the next big,
innovative idea come from? What will it be? Will
it be a cell phone with gadgets galore, made in
Japan and priced high for early adopters? Or
will it be a functional yet inexpensive netbook,
designed and built in India for all of the world
to use?
According to Vijay Govindarajan,
a professor at Dartmouth's Tuck School of
Business, it's the latter circumstance that will
truly bring innovation to the market. He calls
it "reverse innovation," and it could be the
next big growth area for multinational companies
— if they don't let others beat them to the
punch.
Reversing the Innovation
Pattern
According to Govindarajan,
reverse innovation happens when companies in
poorer countries create innovative products,
usually for their own markets, and then export
them to developed countries. More simply, he
defines it as "any innovation likely to be
adopted first in the developing world." This is
the reverse of how it normally happens, with
innovations from rich countries being exported
around the world.
These reverse innovations not
only create new products at low prices — the
$2,500 Tata Nano automobile, for example — they
create solutions, something that engineers from
American companies might not consider their
first priority in product development.
"The reverse innovation idea is
really about elevations that are based on the
problems of poor countries like India and
China," says Govindarajan. He cites examples
such as a $70 portable refrigerator, or a $1,000
handheld electrocardiogram device developed by
General Electric.
Speaking of GE, Govindarajan and
co-authors Jeffrey Immelt (GE's Chairman) and
Chris Trimble first coined the term "reverse
innovation" last year in a Harvard Business
Review article that looked at how the
company was developing products for the
developing world as a way to create new markets,
and as a way to protect itself from competition.
In the article, the trio described the GE EKG
device as extraordinary because it was developed
for the Chinese market, but then made its way to
the United States.
The Barriers to Reverse
Innovation ... and the Opportunities
But GE, says Govindarajan, is an
exception, and most companies are not content to
create new products for developing markets. He
uses the Tata Nano as an example of a product
that meets a need in India, but which American
companies would not be likely to build. "Tata
Motors created the world's cheapest car," says
Govindarajan. "The lady who cleans my house in
Hanover could buy a $2,500 car, too, but why is
Ford not producing that car in the U.S.?"
The answer, he says, is the way
American companies look at the market, the way
innovation is funded, and other factors. "If I'm
Ford," says Govindarajan, there are a vast
number of customers for my product who are rich
or super-rich. If I make a product for them, I
make high margins. I would rather focus on the
big and highly profitable segment."
The high cost of creating
innovative products can also dictate the
eventual market. "Innovation requires spending
money, and I must spread the cost," says
Govindarajan.
Finally, while developing
markets may have large number of potential
customers, they may also lack the infrastructure
for which to deliver new products.
But the lack of infrastructure
can sometimes create opportunities, says
Govindarajan, who argues that an existing
infrastructure can actually slow down
innovation. "The reason there are so many cell
phones in developing countries is there were no
landlines. When you get cell phones, you create
services, because there are no services to
become obsolete. Because the infrastructure is
so established in the United States, your
innovations must be accomplished on top of what
already exists. What would you do with all of
the ATMs if you went to mobile banking? But in
India, you can go directly to mobile banking, or
to electric cars, because there are fewer gas
stations already in place."
How to Get Started?
"What I would recommend for
American engineers," says Govindarajan, "is to
start not with technology but with a customer
problem. The customer problem, the need that
must be solved, must be the starting point for
innovation."
But Govindarajan worries that
American engineers might not be trained or
prepared to think that way. "Many engineers have
a tough time understanding the customer problem.
Their focus is on the products they already
have, and improving them." That does not solve
anything, he says.
If you're really interested in
finding out what potential customers need,
Govindarajan suggests teaming up with your
company's marketing department. "Get out into
the field and really observe customers.
Understand what their unarticulated needs are."
The Benefits of Reverse
Innovation — And the Risk of Ignoring It
"Think about the so-called rich
countries," says Govindarajan.
"Their growth has slowed down. The growth
now is in the emerging markets. If you
concentrate on those markets, the growth will
come back to you."
Meanwhile, if American companies
don't start thinking about innovation for
developing markets first, then companies in
those markets are likely to beat them to it.
"Because American companies focus on the highly
profitable segment, I think reverse innovation
will start in poor countries," says Govindarajan.
"But here's my advice," he says.
"If you don't do it, your company's future is in
peril."
Govindarajan believes that it's
the engineers who have the best chance of
getting reverse innovation off the ground in
this country, by appealing directly to their
managers. "If I were an American engineer, I
would go to my boss and say the growth is in
these countries, and it's a good thing to focus
on good ways to help these people. What else
better is there?"
For more on reverse innovation,
visit Vijay Govindarajan's blog at
www.vijaygovindarajan.com.

John R. Platt is a freelance journalist and
marketing consultant from coastal Maine. He is a
frequent contributor to Today's Engineer.
Comments may be submitted to
todaysengineer@ieee.org.
|