10.09  

> home
> About
>
Contact Us
>
Editorial Info

> IEEE-USA

  feature  


10.09

Railroad Resurrection

By George McClure

The interstate highway system and cheap diesel fuel helped promote the growth of truck freight in the United States. Gas taxes paid for building and maintaining the roadway, in contrast to investor-owned railroads, which must maintain their own infrastructure. Former rail beds have been converted to hiking trails under the “Rails to Trails” program, as railroads abandoned uneconomic routes. The U.S. rail network today, at 94,942 miles, is less than half of the mileage in 1970. [Ref. 1]

The Staggers Rail Act of 1980 eased regulation that included not only rates but routes and services making rail more affordable, safer, and more productive. Over 40 percent of the nation’s freight moves by rail. The Act also encouraged more investment by railroads — over $440 billion in their own systems’ rolling stock and infrastructure (a record $10 billion for capital projects in 2008 alone). At the same time, average inflation-adjusted rail rates have dropped by nearly half since 1981 and productivity has tripled.

Mergers and consolidations have reduced the number of Class I railroads (with operating revenue of $250 million or more), from fourteen in 1990 to seven in 2005. Deregulation of freight rates aided trucking firms more than railroads. The Interstate Commerce Commission, formerly responsible for setting freight rates, was replaced in 1996 with the Surface Transportation Board.

Freight rail renaissance

With sharply higher fuel prices, railroads have shown their economic value. About half the electricity generated in the United States is produced from coal. Forty-five percent of the tonnage carried by railroads consists of coal trains. Over 43 percent of all intercity long-haul freight moves by rail, as does 71 percent of the nation’s coal, 35 percent of its grain, and 70 percent of all automobiles produced in the United States. Truck trailers are hauled for long distances on trailer-train flatbed cars. Containers of imported goods are routinely shipped from seaports by trains. Before the current recession, transcontinental rail routes were filled to capacity with trainloads of containers. Freight rail traffic was down 17.5 percent for carloads in July 2009 compared to July 2008. For intermodal rail traffic, the decline was 18.0 percent over the same period. The all-time peak traffic was in June 2006. 

Optimizing freight movement

Rail routes are often not the most direct path for shippers, and railroad freight has difficulty competing with highway trucks in terms of delivery speed. Intermodal operation, where highway trucking can cover the first and last few miles between shipper and recipient, with the cargo on specially configured freight trains for the other hundred or thousand miles, saves energy and labor. Freight rail moves 436 tons of freight one mile using a gallon of diesel fuel, according to the Association of American Railroads. Fuel efficiency is important, considering that on 11 July 2008, West Texas Intermediate crude oil hit $147.27 per barrel, about twice the present price, and likely will rise further. [Ref. 2]

Freight rail corridors can speed up traffic and, permitting double-decked containers, increase labor productivity. Two such corridors involving the Norfolk Southern, the nation’s fourth largest railroad, are the $253 million Heartland Corridor, now underway, connecting Norfolk to Chicago, and the $2 billion I-81 Crescent Corridor, now being studied, crossing 14 states and eventually connecting Texas and New Jersey, with what has been called a steel interstate.

Rail corridor efficiency

The 1031 mile route for the Heartland Corridor will save 200 miles from the existing route, and require a day less shipping time. It will permit double-stacked containers to move from the port of Norfolk to Chicago, after height modifications are made to 11 of 29 tunnels and other obstructions removed. Along with a new intermodal shipping transfer center in Prichard, West Virginia (on the border with Kentucky), the project should be operational next year. The Prichard terminal would have access to rail, highway and river transportation and be operated by the West Virginia Public Port Authority. [Ref. 3]

According to the Port Authority director, Patrick Donovan, such a facility would employ 750 to 1,000 people. An intermodal terminal also would lead to $12 million to $17 million in fuel savings annually for West Virginia shippers.

"We've completed the feasibility study," he said. "A $30 million investment would have a 1.6 to 2.4 cost benefit analysis. That's a 160 to 200 percent return on investment."

The study, however, was conducted when diesel prices were around $2.50 per gallon.

"The savings to shippers have gone up significantly since then," Donovan said. 

Public-Private Partnership advantages

States have a stake in funding these corridors, since they aid business development and remove freight traffic congestion from interstate highways. Norfolk Southern has cultivated public-private partnerships to cover the costs. The federal government and states cover $163 million of the Heartland Corridor’s $253 million cost, with the railroad covering the balance. Virginia contributed $22 million to Heartland and has agreed to pay $40 million toward the Crescent Corridor

I-81 through Virginia roughly parallels the Norfolk Southern mainline, built over a century ago. This interstate was designed to carry 15 percent trucks, but heavy trucks now account for 26 percent of all traffic, based on average daily traffic counts, and often exceed 40 percent. The $12 billion cost to rebuild and widen I-81 through Virginia is more than the $9 billion cost to upgrade the entire Norfolk Southern Railway line from Knoxville, TN, to Harrisburg, PA, to handle intermodal freight, permitting 60 percent of through truck traffic to travel by rail. Grade crossings would be eliminated, with rails in a trench or auto roadways on track flyovers. The interstate expansion would require at least 12 years. Another benefit is the reduction in carbon emissions and particulates from the trucks removed to the trains. www.railsolution.org/projects/steel-interstate.html

When fully implemented, the Crescent Corridor initiative will be capable of saving the United States more than 170 million gallons of fuel per year, from more than one million truckloads of freight that will be absorbed from the highways to the rails annually. 

While the United States has focused mostly on cargo containers for intermodal transfer, it should consider other modes as well. In Europe, complete semi trucks (with driver) are carried across country at night in truck-ferries while the driver rests for the next day. This is similar to Amtrak’s Auto Train, where passengers are moved overnight along with their automobiles and personal belongings, between northern Virginia and central Florida. An “open” intermodal approach would carry all kinds of trucks and trailers as well as shipping containers. This is being done with the Trailer-Train concept. 

As rail lines are electrified and diesel locomotives are replaced with electric-powered ones, our use of oil for freight transportation can be drastically reduced — something that over-the-road trucks can’t accomplish.

Higher energy efficiency

Almost all of our freight trains now depend on oil as the energy source, but conversion to electric power is simple and economical, costing about $2 million per mile for infrastructure, in addition to the cost of electric locomotives. Other advantages for electric propulsion are the lower carbon emissions and lower maintenance costs compared to diesel-electric locomotives, and higher efficiency, as dynamic braking returns power to the supply lines rather than dissipating it as heat. A single freight train can take the load of 280 trucks off the road — equivalent to 1,100 cars.

Particulate matter from diesel exhaust is cited by environmentalists as a deterrent for another freight center, proposed by BNSF at Johnson County, Kansas (near Kansas City). The railroad points to studies that dispute this position, but electric propulsion would eliminate the concern.

The case for passenger rail

Passenger airlines took away most of the patronage for passenger trains, promising much faster travel. But adding in the time to clear security at airports, and to travel from outlying airports to city center, makes passenger trains competitive with air travel for distances up to 400 miles. Since 1970, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, known as Amtrak, has been the sole provider of long distance passenger rail travel. It also operates some commuter rail lines. Historically, Amtrak has been underfunded, compared to larger subsidies given for highway, waterway, and air travel. But recent surface transportation bills have begun to change than, giving Amtrak funds for service improvement as well as some rolling stock repair. Its gem is the Northeast Corridor, all-electric service from Boston to New York and Washington, DC. The Acela Express, serving that route for ten years, is capable of higher speeds than it can achieve most of the time because of inadequate roadbed and track.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, enacted 17 February 2009, provided $787 billion for economic stimulus including $8 billion in initiatives for high-speed rail (HSR). Additionally, President Obama said he would seek to budget $5 billion more over the next five years. Plans are being made based on the full $13 billion. 

 Proposed HSR routes include:

  • California Corridor — to link the Bay Area with Los Angeles and San Diego. $9.9 billion in state bonds already committed. Total estimated cost: $44 billion for 800 miles.

  • Chicago Hub Network — to ease congestion that limits some routes to as little as 5 mph. Linked to Midwest High Speed Rail initiative.

  • Empire Corridor — Albany to New York.

  • Florida Corridor — to link Miami, Orlando and Tampa.

  • Gulf Coast Corridor — to link Houston, New Orleans, and Atlanta (considered unlikely).

  • Keystone Corridor — Upgrading Amtrak service between Harrisburg and Philadelphia, but the route is mountainous.

  • Northern New England Corridor — Albany to Boston and Montreal.

  • Pacific Northwest Corridor — linking Oregon, Washington and Vancouver, British Columbia.

  • South Central Corridor — linking Texas, Arkansas, and Oklahoma, but seen as unlikely.

  • Southeast Corridor — to link Jacksonville, Florida and Atlanta to Washington, D.C.

  • Northeast Corridor (NEC) — technically, already HSR, but in need of $3 billion in infrastructure improvements.

 In Europe and Asia, trains run at top speeds of 186 mph to 214 mph, competing successfully with air carriers for passengers. In the United States, the top speed is usually 79 mph, except for the Northeast Corridor. The U.S. goal here is “incremental high speed” — 100- to 110- mph trains. The French manufacturer Alstom is testing a 225 mph train that could be in service in Italy in 2011. 

For now, what $13 billion will buy is re-signaled and upgraded track in a limited number of existing corridors for incrementally faster service, plus planning on the more visionary projects such as the California HSR

Amtrak outlook brighter

With $13 billion authorized over five years for operations and a new $1.3 billion capital budget (to be spent by February 2011), as well as access to some of the stimulus funds through states, Amtrak is in a position to make progress. It is extending the NEC track electrification south from Washington, D.C., to Richmond. Long term, according to CEO Joe Boardman, plans call for electrification of all Amtrak routes, starting with Maine to Miami, then extending westward, accommodating HSR.

As short haul commuter flights prove uneconomic and are discontinued, the market for passenger rail improves. Boardman cites the 245-mile Atlanta-Charlotte corridor (part of the bigger planned Crescent Corridor) as a prospect for increased service and ridership.

Amtrak carried nearly 29 million passengers in 2008, the highest number ever. A 20 percent increase to 35 million is projected. Northeast Corridor riders like the fact that they can arrive at the station just 30 minutes before departure, often have electric outlets at their seats for laptops, and the legroom is twice that of the air shuttles. Wi-fi access, however, is spotty.

Resources

“Back on Tracks,” www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/back_tracks_9914

“Oil: the Long Goodbye,” special issue, Foreign Policy, Sep.-Oct. 2009 www.foreignpolicy.com/node/47222

NS and Public Private Partnerships: The Heartland Corridor & The Crescent Corridor, October 2007 http://transportation.northwestern.edu/docs/0000/
Martinez_presentation.pdf

 

Back

 


George McClure is Technology Policy editor for IEEE-USA Today’s Engineer and the IEEE Vehicular Technology Society's representative to IEEE-USA's Committee on Transportation and Aerospace policy. Comments on this article may be submitted to todaysengineer@ieee.org.

Comments may be submitted to todaysengineer@ieee.org.


Copyright © 2009 IEEE

 

short circuits

Your Engineering Heritage: Early Digital Technology and the Navy

World Bytes: Passing of Mentors

viewpoints

reader feedback

archives

career articles
policy articles
all articles
 
 

archive search

 
 

Comments on this story may be sent directly to Today's Engineer or submitted through our online form.