Augustine Review Panel Says NASA’s Resources
Aren’t Sufficient to Meet Goals in Human
Spaceflight
By Barton
Reppert
The U.S. human spaceflight
program currently appears to be on an
“unsustainable trajectory,” according to a
report by a 10-member expert panel chaired
by Norman R. Augustine, retired chairman and
CEO of Lockheed Martin Corp.
“It is perpetuating the
perilous practice of pursuing goals that do
not match allocated resources,” says the
summary report of the Review of U.S. Human
Spaceflight Plans Committee. “Space
operations are among the most complex and
unforgiving pursuits ever undertaken by
humans. It really is rocket
science. Space operations become all the
more difficult when means do not match
aspirations. Such is the case today.”
At the same time, the report
says, the outlook for strengthening
America’s human spaceflight capabilities can
be improved by undertaking vigorous efforts
involving redoubled international
cooperation with other space-faring
countries, as well as promoting expanded
opportunities for the commercial space
industry.
Jay Greenberg, chairman of
IEEE-USA’s Committee on Transportation and
Aerospace Policy (CTAP), observed that the
Augustine panel’s report “concludes that
there is no plan compatible with budget
projections that ‘permits human exploration
to continue in any meaningful way.’ Although
this report is critical of NASA’s approach
to sustaining U.S. human spaceflight,
IEEE-USA believes that it is important for
Congress to view the forthcoming full report
carefully, as it relates to maintaining
budget projections supporting NASA’s overall
space program.”
Doug Taggart, vice chairman
of CTAP, commented that “IEEE-USA’s initial
reaction to the Augustine Report is that in
reviewing the key questions that should be
addressed for charting the future of the
U.S. human spaceflight program, Congress
should not lose sight of the importance that
the overall U.S. space program plays in
fostering inspiration in this nation’s next
generation of scientists and engineers. In
that regard, it is very important to
maintain a visionary eye to funding NASA’s
overall space program -- with research and
development initiatives and other
investments in technology that benefit
society, drive technical innovation, while
furthering our national expertise in space
exploration and overall scientific
knowledge.”
The Augustine panel’s report
said that “there is now a strong consensus
in the United States that the next step in
human spaceflight is to travel beyond
low-Earth orbit. This should carry important
benefits to society: driving technological
innovation; developing commercial industries
and important national capabilities; and
contributing to our expertise in further
exploration.”
Also, it said the review
committee “concluded that the ultimate goal
of human exploration is to chart a path for
human expansion into the solar system. This
is an ambitious goal, but one worthy of U.S.
leadership in concert with a broad range of
international partners.”
In view of reports that
NASA’s exploration program was encountering
serious technical and budgetary problems,
President Barack Obama established the
Augustine committee and gave it 90 days to
review the situation. However, at this point
it remains unclear whether the
Administration wants to significantly
increase budget outlays for space.
The space shuttle is
scheduled to be retired 2010, after which
there will be a gap of up to seven years
during which American astronauts will have
to rely on Russian spacecraft.
NASA’s Constellation program
calls for developing two new rockets, a new
crew capsule and the return of astronauts to
the moon by 2020. However, the Augustine
report says that without additional funding,
a heavy-lift rocket to carry large payloads
to the moon likely will not be ready until
the late 2020s, and also that there may be
insufficient funds to develop the lunar
lander and lunar surface systems until well
into the 2030s.
On Capitol Hill, the
Augustine panel’s findings were the focus of
a 15 September hearing by the House Science
and Technology Committee.
The committee’s chair, Rep.
Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., told the session: “I
have made no secret in recent years of my
belief that the resources given to NASA
haven’t kept pace with the important tasks
that we have asked NASA to undertake. That
has caused significant stresses in recent
years, and we can’t continue down that path.
We either have to give NASA the resources
that it needs or stop pretending that it can
do all we’ve put on its plate. That’s
especially true for NASA’s exploration
program, and it’s true for the rest of its
important missions, too.”
Rep. Ralph Hall, R-Texas,
ranking Republican on the Science and
Technology Committee, said: “It is my
opinion that NASA has the greatest chance of
success if given a clearly defined
destination and the clearly defined design
requirements that go with it. Our greatest
concern has long been the inadequate level
of funding being requested, and the gap
between the retirement of the space shuttle
and development of the follow-on
Constellation system.”
Hall added: “I am not a fan
of increased spending, but I have always
thought our human spaceflight program gives
the United States so much to be proud of,
and carries within it the promise of
significant breakthroughs in healthcare,
defense and alternative energy sources.”
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz.,
chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Space and
Aeronautics, said the Augustine review panel
has “given us a sobering reminder that our
position as the world’s leading space-faring
nation is not a given – we continually need
to re-earn that pre-eminent position through
our actions, and we can’t just rest on past
laurels. The rest of the world has
discovered space too, and we are seeing the
emergence of impressive capabilities in
other countries we need to take seriously.”
Also serving as members of
the Augustine review committee were:
-
Dr. Wanda M. Austin,
president and CEO, The Aerospace Corp
-
Bohdan I. Bejmuk, chair,
NASA Constellation Standing Review Board
-
Dr. Leroy Chiao, former
astronaut, former International Space
Station commander and engineering
consultant
-
Dr. Christopher F. Chyba,
professor of astrophysics sciences and
international affairs, Princeton
University
-
Dr. Edward F. Crawley,
Ford Professor of Engineering, MIT
-
Jeffrey K. Greason,
co-founder and CEO, XCOR Aerospace
-
Dr. Charles F. Kennel,
director and professor emeritus, Scripps
Institution of Oceanography, University
of California, San Diego
-
Gen. Lester Lyles, USAF
(retired)
-
Dr. Sally Ride,
president and CEO, Imaginary Lines