|
05.07
Saving Energy
with Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles
By Cliff Lau
With gasoline prices averaging more than
$3.00 per gallon today, and with the global
warming issue heating up in Congress and in
public awareness, it's not surprising to see plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV)
making headlines. Car buyers are wondering, when
can we buy a plug-in electric vehicle?
Electrical, mechanical and automotive engineers
are working feverishly to bring these cars to
the market. Since many of these engineers are
IEEE members, it
makes sense for us to strongly support the
development of plug-in hybrids.
What is PHEV?
Simply put, a plug-in hybrid
electric vehicle is a vehicle
that can be driven by an electric motor for at
least 10 miles without consuming any gasoline,
and its battery system can be recharged by plugging
it into the wall outlet.
PHEVs differ from today’s
hybrids, such as the Toyota Prius and the Honda
Civic Hybrid, in that these conventional hybrids
cannot be driven by the electric motor alone.
Such cars are powered by gasoline engines, with
the electric motors providing an assist in
acceleration. During deceleration, electricity
is generated to recharge the battery. The
important difference is that PHEVs can be
plugged into the wall outlet to recharge the
battery storage system which can drive the
vehicle for at least 10 miles without consuming
a drop of gasoline. Still, PHEVs are not
entirely electric cars, like an electric golf cart,
or like other electric vehicles like the new Tesla
Roadster. A PHEV is a hybrid that utilizes a gasoline
engine for long-range driving.
The April 2007 issue of
IEEE Spectrum has an article that describes
the top 10 technology-laden cars [www.spectrum.ieee.org/apr07/5012].
One PHEV is the Chevrolet Volt, a concept car with
a 120 KW electric motor and a 3-cylinder
turbocharged gasoline motor. In the all-electric
mode, the Volt can be driven for about 40 miles,
with a recharging time of approximately 6.5 hours.
Such a PHEV would be ideal for commuters with
short round-trip driving distances.
Why PHEV?
Concerned about a looming
energy crisis and global warming caused by
the burning of fossil fuel, Congress
took action. On 6 March 2007, the House
of Representative introduced H.R. 1331 to amend
the Internal Revenue Code to provide tax credits
for new qualified plug-in hybrid motor vehicles.
The qualified vehicles are defined as any new
hybrid motor vehicle that: (1) is a passenger
automobile or light truck with a gross vehicle
weight rating of not more than 8,500 pounds; (2)
meets or exceeds EPA emission standards; (3)
draws propulsion energy from a traction battery
of not less than 4 KWh; and (4) is equipped with
a means of recharging its energy storage system
from an external source of electricity.
Today’s hybrid vehicles are
already making significant impacts on our
overall gasoline consumption. The average
conventional light-duty vehicle weight, at 4,000
lbs. in 1976, dropped to 3,200 lbs. by 1981, but
was back to 4,000 lbs. in 2005. Over the same
period, the time to go from 0 to 60 mph dropped
from over 14 seconds to less than 10 seconds [chart, page 5 at
www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/mpg/fetrends/420s06003.pdf].
The official EPA mileage table gives a good
comparison of how much gasoline the hybrids can
save, although actual mileage can be lower than
the EPA estimates for both hybrid cars and for
conventional gasoline engine cars. EPA's Web
site for this analysis is
www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/download.shtml.
Using 2006 data for otherwise
identical models of hybrid and non-hybrid cars
and SUVs, the hybrids show combined
mileage between 20 percent and 47 percent better than the
corresponding gasoline model. The Toyota Prius,
at 47 percent, is currently the leader, but other
manufacturers are catching up rapidly. Similarly,
the 2007 data showed mileage improvement between
16 percent and 40 percent. If one compares cars that are
specifically designed as hybrid, the mileage
improvement is even more significant,
approaching 50 percent, even though the
comparison is not on otherwise identical models.
Reducing gasoline consumption
can save consumers a bundle of money. If we
assume the gasoline price at $3.00 per gallon,
and the car is driven between 12,000 and 15,000
miles per year, the cost savings can be
significant — between $140 and $720 using the
above EPA estimates. The following table shows
the economics of operating a purely electric
powered vehicle, such as the new Tesla Roadster
scheduled for delivery in 2008, against a
conventional gasoline engine vehicle [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Roadster].
Table 1 - Economic comparison of
electric (Tesla) and gasoline vehicles
|
Conventional Automobile |
| Cost
of gasoline, per gallon |
$3.00 |
| Fuel
efficiency of conventional car |
MPG
<30 |
|
Operating cost per 100 miles, $ |
$10.00 |
|
Typical range, miles |
250 |
| Curb
weight, pounds |
~4,000 |
|
Electric Drive Automobile |
|
Retail cost of electricity, $/kWh |
0.11 |
|
Charging efficiency, percent |
86% |
| Cost
of energy in batteries $/kWh |
0.128 |
|
Electric efficiency (actual data),
kWh/mi |
0.177 |
|
Operating cost per 100 miles, $ |
$2.26 |
| Size
of battery, kWh |
44 |
| Range
of vehicle (projected), miles |
>200 |
|
Weight of Li-Ion batteries, pounds |
990 |
| Curb
weight, pounds |
>2600 |
|
See also
www.mercurynews.com/drive/ci_5701901 |
Reducing the consumption of
gasoline and our dependence on foreign oil has
tremendous impact on our economic and national
security. In the past, the petroleum producing
cartels have essentially held the United States hostage by
creating artificial gasoline shortages.
Many of us remember the long gasoline lines in
the 1970s. Even when no shortage exists,
gasoline
prices continue to climb, creating economic hardship in certain sectors
of the economy. In the case of extreme shortage
or even complete shutdown of gasoline supply, or
in the case of extreme gasoline price hike, PHEVs would allow us to drive to work, shopping
and other regular business, minimizing economic disruptions. In terms of national
security, PHEVs would reduce our overall
dependence on foreign
oil.
Obviously, integrating a large
number of plug-in electric vehicles into the
electric power grid is no small matter. It is
necessary to examine the impact of a substantial
increase in demand for electricity. To a first
approximation, it is likely that these electric
vehicles would be charged at night when the
marginal units are the most efficient. Generally,
demand for electricity is low at night
after primetime. It is very likely that the use
of these PHEVs would not impose requirements for
additional electrical capacity, but it requires
further study. Detailed analysis, considering
all factors, as well as both the advantages and
the disadvantages, is necessary to facilitate
the large-scale deployment of PHEVs.
IEEE-USA position
IEEE-USA, representing a
significant number
of electrical engineers in the United States, is in a good
position to promote the use of PHEVs. IEEE-USA supports the development of PHEVs, and
recommends the following:
-
Speed up the development and
widespread use of plug-in hybrid electric
vehicles to add resilience to our
transportation system, and to increase energy
independence
-
Promote research and
development efforts and programs to improve
batteries for the plug-in vehicles
-
Utilize appropriate
government incentives to encourage a greater
adoption and penetration in the consumer
market for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
-
Encourage the introduction
of sophisticated electricity metering and
pricing by electric utilities that will
permit the full realization of all the
benefits of advanced battery charging
systems
-
Promote research on the
integration and impact of PHEVs on the
electric power grid and the development of
standards to facilitate the development of
the industry
In summary, IEEE-USA is
committed to promoting the research and
development of PHEVs to achieve economic and
national security benefits. Today, the most
efficient hybrids are already cutting gasoline
consumption by as much as 40 percent. PHEVs can cut
gasoline consumption further, to as much as 50
percent or more.

Dr. Cliff Lau is a research
staff member at the Institute for Defense
Analyses, and is currently the IEEE-USA Vice
President for Technology Policy. Comments may be
submitted to
todaysengineer@ieee.org.
|