|

November
2006
Debunking Employment Agency Myths
By Elizabeth Lions
Since I began recruiting for the high-tech industry in 2002, I
have witnessed many professional recruiters engage in questionable
practices. These transgressions have fueled my fire to stand up for
job seekers and their rights. I didn't know when I started
that I would make a career out of acting as a liaison between
technical professionals and businesses. Suffice it to say, I love
working with engineers and am considered an advocate.
My observations have led me to conclude that many engineers align
themselves with an agency so that they
don t have to go through the trouble of finding another full-time
job or contract.
And more
often than not, they do not have a positive, or professional
experience with a headhunter. Often, they walk away confused,
frustrated and jaded, wondering what on earth went wrong.
The recruitment process should never be that way. It
should involve a lot of give and take. My vision has
always been that the relationship should be balanced you get a good job and representation,
and the agency gets is the
privilege of aligning themselves with top talent. You can take your
talent anywhere you d like to take it. A good recruiter should
realize that they are lucky to have you, but too often recruiters
take talent for granted, and the end result is unhappy job
seekers.
For years, engineers have shared with me their
disappointing experiences with agencies. Coming from an agency background myself, I am able to read between the
lines and help interpret what really went on in meetings.
In hopes of providing some insight and clarity on
the engineer/recruiter relationship, I d like
to share that with you some candid thoughts, based on my experience
as a professional recruiter. Following are some common complaints I
hear from engineers working with employment agencies, followed by an
explanation of what might really be happening behind the scenes.
|