|
April
2006Web Site 101: Put Yourself in the User's
Shoes
By Robin Peress
Real estate agents call it curb appeal. Anyone who's
bought or sold a house knows curb appeal refers to the small outward
details that convey, at a moment's glance, the desirability of a
given place: the trimmed lawn, the clean windows, the tidy garage.
Curb appeal persuades a prospect to stop for a peek at your
property; without it, the same buyer may drive on by.
Now consider a very different "domain" with some
not-so-different needs: your Web site. Just as a home's appearance
speaks a visual and emotional language to the house-hunter, the look
of a Web site — your Internet real estate — speaks volumes about you.
(Maybe it's not called a "home" page for nothing.) The all-important
first impression counts here, too.
You've posted your top-flight resume, roster of
clients and other impressive credentials. Experts say that's not
enough: Your information should be presented in an easy-to-read,
easy-to-navigate, visually pleasing way, or Internet users will
withdraw to find a site that aids their mission. In the words of
renowned Web usability "guru" Jakob Nielsen, of Nielsen Norman Group
and a Distinguished Engineer at Sun Microsystems until 1998, "If a
site doesn't provide immediate gratification, they leave."
So, if your awards and patents are buried in text
people must squint to read — or worse, can't understand — it's
tantamount to strewing old rubber tires on the lawn of a gilded
mansion.
That's not fair, you say. My work speaks for itself;
I'm an engineer, not an "artiste."
Rather than knowing art, the key is to follow some
rules of visual grammar and logic that apply whether you're an
engineer or a dancer. No need to buy a book for dummies or hire a
Web designer to festoon your site with Flash and applets. You
already have the tools. But do you know how important they are?
Facing Up to the Interface
Usability is the Holy Grail for software engineers,
graphic artists, psychologists, marketing pros and others who've
worked to refine the recipe for optimal Web page design. Usability,
the human-computer interface (HCI) and user-centered design are
almost identical ideas, usually spoken of in the same breath.
Usability is a broad term that takes in technical
performance, accessibility and design, among other traits. But its
connotation goes further: Usability aims to make a computer and a
person work together swiftly and seamlessly. It revolves around the
person.
Usability, or the absence of it, greatly influences
human behavior. The slightest difficulty or delay in extracting
information can make people bolt. Take file formats. According to
webcontent.gov, usability studies show that visitors can become
frustrated when downloading additional software or plug-ins to
access information, even if the software is free, because it's
time-consuming.
Through more than a decade of studying such human
behavior, a set of Web "heuristics" has emerged that are widely
accepted and strongly encouraged.
Heuristics, from the Greek
word heuriskein, "to discover," refers to the process of gaining
knowledge through trial-and-error methods. In cyberland, heuristics
(and similar terms like Web metrics) are the educated assumptions by
which usability can be measured and promoted. "Anticipate the user's
needs" is one such directive. An example of this heuristic might be
to provide definitions of unusual technical words for newcomers to
your Web site. Sometimes the phrase "best practices" also refers to
heuristics.
An underpinning of best practices in Web design is
the need to write and display your content to meet your user's
expectations. Web users hunger for organization, clarity, unity,
simple color composition, reliability, predictability and dozens of
other factors. The better these needs are met, the better experience
the user has. The better the experience, the longer the user will
hang around to learn what you're about.
Some barriers to effective communication are
obvious, like too-tiny print or a difficult-to-read font. Other
obstacles are subtle or unseen, such as vague section headings or
dead links. Jarring colors and helter-skelter text placement are
known bugaboos, as are convoluted technical language and
inconsistently placed task icons. Sites that ignore human-computer
interface principles, especially those concerning appearance, risk
alienating a significant percentage of their desired audience.
Good Looks = More Looking
In 2002, Consumer Reports WebWatch, an Internet
research arm of Consumer Reports, conducted a study to determine how
people judge the credibility of a Web site. The study involved some
2,600 users who each evaluated 100 sites representing various
sectors including e-commerce, health, news, finance, travel and
sports.
Of 18 criteria applied by the users — among them the
perception of customer service, site functionality, name
recognition, company motive and information focus — nearly half
(46.1 percent) of the users rated "Design Look" as the key determinant of a
site's credibility. In other words, the better the site looked, the
more credible it seemed. The elements of Design Look included
layout, typography, white space and color schemes. The next most
important criterion, at 28.5 percent, was information structure.
CR WebWatch noted the way participants "relied
heavily on the surface qualities of a Web site to make credibility
judgments" and said that the data suggest "quality information alone
is not enough…" If a site fails on the Design Look criterion, "…Web
users are likely to abandon the site and seek other sources of
information and services." This conclusion is echoed in usability
research by other organizations including JupiterResearch and
Forrester Research, most of it proprietary.
However, there's an abundance of excellent,
practical guidance on the Internet: IBM's Ease of Use web pages and
Sun Microsystems' Writing for the Web can help anyone harness the
human-computer interface.
Two more authoritative tutorials are
Usability.gov's Research-Based
Web Design & Usability Guidelines and
Webcontent.gov's Best
Practices, both of which devote several subsections to choosing
simple but compelling language, layout, graphics and typography.
You're bound to extract usable ideas from Jakob
Nielsen's own site, www.useit.com, particularly his long-running
Alertbox columns dating back to 1995 with such titles as Top 10
Guidelines for Homepage Usability, Let Users Control Font Size, and
Do Interface Standards Stifle Design Creativity? One look at
Nielsen's site tells you where he stands on Web site design. Crisp
twelve-point Verdana sans-serif body copy, large and bold headlines,
judicious use of color, the absence of slow-loading graphics…Nielsen
eschews conventional prettiness for simplicity and clarity because
he is user-directed, not self-directed.
Being on the User's Page
The following building blocks of usability are drawn
from several online sources of Web wisdom. Together they add up to
an oft-cited ideal: The best design is the one that doesn't get
noticed.
-
Use "breadcrumbs" to help visitors navigate.
Talking Heads has a song that goes, "You may ask yourself, how did I
get here?" That's how a user feels when there are no so-called
breadcrumbs providing a trail backward from their starting point in
a Web site. These hierarchical locaters — e.g., Home → About Us → Jobs
→ NY
Jobs — are usually in the upper left corner and are essential to a
helpful site.
-
Put yourself in good company. The engineering
profession may stress innovation, but in Web site design, emulating
the winners is a good thing. About.com's Top 25 sites run the gamut
from E-Bay to the FBI. Howstuffworks.com, a hybrid site of
information and consumer products, is a model of user-centered
design, as is LandsEnd.com.

Robin Peress is a freelance writer in
Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y. Comments may be submitted to
todaysengineer@ieee.org.
|