|
April
2006
backscatter
Picking a Good Boss
by Donald Christiansen
Most experienced engineers agree that having a good
boss is one of the most important aspects of one's job. Your boss
can serve not only as a professional colleague, mentor and leader,
but often as a shield from the whims of an oppressive bureaucracy.
But how to find a good boss? The odds seem in your
favor at a company known by its employees as a good place to work.
The likelihood is enhanced if its culture (policies and practices)
appeals to you personally.
Over the past few decades, several lists of "100 Best
Companies to Work For" have been published. Compiled by
a team of business journalists and researchers in 1983, one version included 17
high-tech companies, among them Intel, IBM, General Electric,
Hewlett-Packard and Apple Computer. This year, using similar but
not identical criteria, Fortune magazine's list included only one of
the aforementioned 17 — Intel. Five not on the 1983 list were
Qualcomm, Cisco Systems, Microsoft, National Instruments, and Texas
Instruments. Among the pluses cited by Fortune for the
best-to-work-for companies were these: generous fringes (Microsoft);
never a layoff (National Instruments); stock for new employees
(Qualcomm); and a friendly confrontational culture (Intel).
But these lists must be taken with a grain of salt.
In fairness, it should be noted that the surveys and interviews
undertaken to compile the Fortune lists include a random selection
of employees, not just engineers, and that the companies' cooperation is needed to complete the exhaustive rating process (e.g.,
Apple declined to participate).
The most successful companies are not necessarily
those rated the best to work for. In 2005, General
Electric, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Motorola, Verizon, Dell, Bell South,
Intel, Cisco Systems, and Microsoft were among Fortune's top 100 in
revenues, but of those only Intel, Cisco, and Microsoft made the
current Fortune best-to-work-for list. And if best-to-work-for and
most-successful lists are insufficient, there is still a third — Fortune's "most admired."
For this list, a jury of corporate directors,
top executives, and financial analysts invoke a different measure
for rating companies. For example, in Fortune's 2006 ratings,
against criteria that included investment value and financial
soundness, this "jury of peers" put General Electric first. Also
among the top 20 were Dell, Microsoft, Apple and IBM.
Big Bosses
When corporate CEOs are more than figureheads,
their styles of leadership can permeate the entire organization,
and lower-level management and staff may react well or badly to the
omnipresent hand of the top dog. Several companies founded by
engineers became noted for their collegial work environment and
enlightened corporate cultures.
-
Founders Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard set the
tone for the Hewlett-Packard (HP) culture that lasted throughout their tenure as
active heads of the company. A survey of more than 7,900 HP employees in 1979 showed such high regard for the
company that the management survey group placed HP in the top 0.5
percent of 1,000 companies surveyed.
-
Founded by engineer Howard Vollum,
Tektronix followed the HP style of management closely. From visits to Tek, I
recall the low-walled, carpetless spaces of its department heads
that made for quick and easy communication with all employees, who
were on a first-name basis with their bosses.
On the other hand, a new
CEO arriving on the scene can sometimes send shockwaves through the management pattern of
an established organization.
-
Upon succeeding Reginald Jones as CEO
of General Electric, Jack Welch radically changed the conservative nature of
the company, disrupting the ingrained management style of many GE
veterans. Among Welch's reforms was the requirement that GE
business leaders earmark 10 percent of their managers as poor
performers during the annual evaluation process. Those so designated
got no raise and "generally had to go," according to Welch. They
knew who they were, and that they had better shape up or ship out.
But executives who had built a management team with which they were
completely satisfied rebelled. Some would even list managers about
to retire, or, in one case, a manager who had died. Welch made it
clear that executives who failed to comply would find themselves on
the bottom rung. In his memoir, Jack: Straight from the Gut, Welch
boasted that finding or creating GE managers in his own aggressive
leadership image vastly improved GE's bottom line.
Hot Projects
At the top of the list of important job
characteristics, engineers put the technical sophistication of the
project to which they are assigned. But those chosen to take part in
a challenging project may not always find the boss to be the most
personable leader. Nevertheless, a leader's idiosyncrasies may be
outweighed by the excitement and, perhaps, the glory of working on
the project. In Organizing Genius, Warren Bennis gives the
following examples.
-
Famed as the inspirational leader of
the Apple Macintosh computer project, Steve Jobs was noted for his arrogant and
acerbic "walking around" management style, in which he would often
blindside technical staff members with scathing comments about
something they were developing, but about which he himself often had
no relevant expertise.
-
Xerox PARC's Bob Taylor was able to shield PARC
staff from the conventional thinking of the Xerox bureaucracy. Yet,
according to one of his staff members (as reported by Bennis),
Taylor rated most of those he dealt with on a "binary scale" — as
either "the greatest thing that walked the earth" or "beneath
consideration," to put it kindly.
-
Clarence Kelly Johnson, who headed Lockheed's
Advanced Development Projects (the famous "Skunk Works"), was an
eminent aeronautical engineer noted for his bullying stubbornness
and hair-trigger temper. His successor, Ben Rich (selected by
Johnson), called him the toughest boss west of the Mississippi.
Johnson nevertheless was respected and admired for his aeronautical
genius. (Rich did not continue Johnson's practice of calling all the
shots, telling the Skunk Works team "I'll be decisive in telling you
what I want, then step out of the way and let you do it.")
No Silver Bullet
In the end, although you may carefully study a
company's culture and the nature of its products and projects, a
good deal of luck is involved in selecting a good boss.
My advice is this: If you happen to pick a boss you
don't like, don't blame it on him (or her). Move on. Find a new
boss.
Unless, of course, you elect to become subversive,
instigate a cabal, enjoy sleepless nights, upset your intestinal
tract, and aggravate your family—and possibly become president of
the company.
Resources
For more on "good" companies, projects, and bosses:
R. Levering, M. Moskowitz, and M. Katz, The 100 Best
Companies to Work for in America, Addison-Wesley, 1984.
"The 100 Best Companies to Work For: 2006," Fortune, 23 January 2006.
"The Fortune 500: 2005," Fortune magazine, 18 April
2005.
W. Bennis and P. W. Biederman, Organizing Genius:
The Secrets of Creative Collaboration, Addison-Wesley, 1997.
J. Welch, Jack: Straight from the Gut, Warner
Business Books, 2001.
B. Rich and L. Janos, Skunk Works, Little, Brown, 1994.
T. Kidder, The Soul of a New Machine, Atlantic
(Little, Brown), 1981.
Inside Out: Microsoft—In Our Own Words, Warner Business Books, 2000
(25th Anniversary interviews with Microsoft managers and
executives).
F.A. Maxwell, Bad Boy Ballmer: The Man Who Rules
Microsoft, William
Morrow, 2002.
R. Slater, Microsoft Rebooted, Portfolio, 2004.
J. Young, Cisco Unauthorized, Forum, 2001.
G. Dorsey, Silicon Sky, Perseus, 1999 (about Orbital
Sciences Corporation).
D. Packard, The H P Way, Harper Collins, 1995.
"America's Most Admired Companies," Fortune
magazine, 6 March 2006.

Donald Christiansen is the former editor and
publisher of IEEE Spectrum and an independent publishing
consultant. He may be reached at
donchristiansen@ieee.org.
|