|
National
Nanotechnology Initiative Unveils Strategic Plan
by Barton Reppert
A new strategic plan
for the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) sizes up the
government R&D effort’s first five years as a success and lays
out an ambitious agenda for continuing development of
nanotechnology over the next five to 10 years.
Released in
December, the plan was mandated under provisions of the 21st Century
Nanotechnology Research and Development Act, signed into law in
late 2003. The National Science and
Technology Council’s Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science,
Engineering and Technology (NSET) prepared it.
In a transmittal
letter accompanying the 31-page document, White House science
adviser John H. Marburger III commented that “R&D supported by
the NNI could lead to cleaner and less wasteful methods of
manufacture, stronger and lighter building materials, smaller
yet faster computers, and more powerful ways to detect and treat
disease.”
“In its first five
years, the NNI, through the participating agencies, has advanced
our knowledge of matter at the nanoscale, and has made progress
toward establishing the infrastructure needed to allow further
scientific and technological breakthroughs,” Marburger wrote.
“By implementing the plan described in this report over the next
five years and beyond, the NNI will ensure that the United
States remains a world leader in nanotechnology R&D, and will
facilitate the transition of results to strengthen the U.S.
economy and to address national needs.”
According to the NNI
report, since the National Nanotechnology Initiative was
launched in fiscal year 2001, the annual federal investment in
nanotechnology R&D has more than doubled to almost $1 billion,
while the number of federal agencies investing in nanotech R&D
has grown from six to 11. The total number of agencies
participating in the government initiative has grown from six to
22.
“The strategy for the
initiative that was laid out in 2001 has been, by all measures,
a success,” according to the NNI plan document. “Nanotechnology R&D has
led to substantial increases in scientific knowledge,
publications, patents, and new jobs and businesses in this area.
Much of this success is directly or indirectly based on the
results of federally funded R&D, and the NNI has become the
model for similar programs around the world.”
The strategic plan set
forth the following four basic goals for the future:
- Maintain a
world-class research and development program aimed at
realizing the full potential of nanotechnology
- Facilitate
transfer of new technologies into products for economic
growth, jobs and other public benefit
- Develop
educational resources, a skilled workforce, and the
supporting infrastructure and tools to advance
nanotechnology
- Support
responsible development of nanotechnology
The document described
various efforts that are now being made, or are planned, to
facilitate technology transfer from research into products.
Current activities in pursuit of this goal include establishing
NSET industry liaison groups with various commercial sectors;
supporting meetings of researchers from academia, government,
and industry; fostering interaction through the establishment or
support of user facilities available to researchers from all
sectors; requiring that all National Science Foundation
Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers include industry
partners; and participating in standards development activities,
including the American National Standards Institute
Nanotechnology Standards Panel established in September 2004.
In the area of
responsible development, the NNI Strategic Plan noted that this
goal involves addressing various societal implications of
nanotechnology. “Societal dimensions include a diverse range of
subjects, such as access to benefits arising from
nanotechnology, effects on the labor pool, changes in the way
medicine is practiced, the impact of manufacturing locally at
the point of need, concerns regarding possible health or
environmental effects, and privacy concerns arising from
distributed nanotechnology-based sensors,” the report said.
When asked what
single, most important message the Strategic Plan conveys, Dr. James S. Murday,
executive secretary of NSET and superintendent of the Chemistry
Division at the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.,
said: “There is a continuing
commitment to basic research, but with growing attention to the
transition of research discovery into innovative technology.
This is particularly significant in the sense that progress in nanoscience has been very rapid and, only five years into the
NNI, technology is already becoming evident.”
On the question of
collaboration with U.S. industry, Murday observed: “The NNI has
been reaching out to industrial collaborations. Something called
CBAN —
consultative boards to advance nanotechnology
— has been
initiated. Thus far, the electronics and chemical industries have
each established a CBAN. The NNI is working on additional CBAN
relationships with the bioindustry, the automotive industry and
the aerospace industry.”
Dr. Clifford Lau, a
researcher with the Institute for Defense Analyses, in
Alexandria, Va., and past president of the IEEE Nanotechnology
Council (a multidisciplinary group whose purpose is to advance and coordinate
work in nanotechnology carried out throughout the IEEE), said he
is quite satisfied with the new NNI Strategic Plan.
Lau was particularly impressed by a four-page section of the
document detailing cross-cutting areas of application, involving
nanotechnology work by multiple government agencies. Agency
participation and partnerships are listed for application areas
including aerospace, agriculture and food, national defense and
homeland security, energy, environmental improvement,
information technologies, medicine and health, and
transportation and civil infrastructure.
Chad Wieland, a patent
attorney with Burns Doane Swecker & Mathis in Alexandria, Va.,
is encouraged to see that the membership of NSET, the
NSTC subcommittee which oversees the NNI, now includes two
representatives from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
“That is the first
time that I know of, and I think it must be the first time ever,
that the Patent Office has been involved in this kind of
activity on the federal level,” Wieland commented, adding: “It
demonstrates that the people in the federal government who are
aware of nanotechnology’s needs recognize the extremely strong
need for a strong patent system to be in place with respect to
nanotechnology.”
Richard H. Smith,
co-founder of the Nanotechnology Policy Foundation and principal
of Nanoverse LLC, a nanotechnology commercialization venture,
remarked about the NNI Strategic Plan: “I think they’ve done a
very good job at least in terms of laying out the broad goals.”
Smith is
impressed by the plan’s increased attention to the development
component of R&D. “They seem to me to be putting more emphasis
on commercialization and development than they had in the past,”
he says.
Smith also commented
that the new plan indicates some increase of emphasis on dealing
with societal implications of nanotechnology. “This document
reflects a much broader understanding of the range of potential
societal implications than they’d ever shown before. The
examples that they give still tend to be in the area of
toxicology, which is understandable. But they do recognize the
kind of things that we ought to be thinking about, like how it
is going to influence job creation,” Smith said.
IEEE-USA's Perspective
IEEE-USA believes that nanotechnology is an enabling
technology that will positively affect all aspects of
the nation's economy and quality of life, and will help
America maintain its technological leadership. In 2003,
IEEE-USA approved a policy position statement in support
of nanotechnology R&D, calling on Congress and the
Executive Branch to: authorize continued and stable
funding for the NNI; encourage and support
nanotechnology-related technology transfer programs;
provide Incentives for commercialization; facilitate
development and implementation of nanotechnology
standards; support nanotechnology education programs;
and explore the societal and environmental implications
of nanotechnology.
more |
|

Barton Reppert is a
freelance science and technology writer based in Gaithersburg,
Md. He previously worked for 18 years as a reporter and editor
with The Associated Press in Washington, D.C., New York and Moscow.
E-mail: barton.reppert@verizon.net
|