Back

June - July 2004

 

 

short circuits

Your Engineering Heritage: Early Digital Technology and the Navy

World Bytes: Passing of Mentors

viewpoints

reader feedback

archives

career articles
policy articles
all articles
 
 

archive search

 
 

Comments on this story may be sent directly to Today's Engineer or submitted through our online form.

 
 

 

 

World Bytes

Generational Diversity
& Other Thoughts to Chew On

by Terrance Malkinson

 

 

While there are many mutually shared values among generations, many differences exist as well. A generation is defined as a group of people who were born during an era and who shared similar experiences when growing up. Today’s workforce is often divided into four generations: Matures (1920-40), Boomers (1940-60), Generation X (1960-80), and Millennials (1980-2000). In general, workplaces include a mix of generational cohort groups. So, all employers need to understand the different generational values. And organizations must build a culture that connects the shared values of all generations. Offering flexibility in benefits, and creating a work environment that is appealing to members of all generations, adds up to good business.

To read more about generational diversity in the workplace, consider these resources:

  • Southard, G., and J. Lewis. Building a Workplace that Recognizes Generational Diversity. Public Management. 86(3): 8-12, 2004 www.icma.org/pm

Other Bytes

Here are some of the things going on in and around the engineering community:

  • Because many of today’s projects are highly complex, organizations must set up specialized teams that must learn to work together collaboratively. In “Inter-team Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R & D Projects: A Longitudinal Study” (Organizational Science; 15(1): 38-55, 2004; http://web.gsia.cmu.edu/orgsci/Default.htm), Martin Hoegl et. al. discuss the results of their research on collaborative processes between teams on large projects. Their research of 39 teams showed that collaborative processes have predictive properties with regard to later team performance and can serve as early warning indicators. Further, they found a positive relationship between inter-team coordination, project commitment and teamwork quality. The authors discuss the theoretical and practical implications of their study.
  • Implementing employment equity in the workforce should be seen as yielding real benefits to business. In “Diversity Works” (Canadian Business; 77(7): 53-54, 2004; www.canadianbusiness.com), Kamal Dib discusses 10 business benefits of employment equity based on the Canadian experience. As the author concludes, “a healthy and educated society should be wealthier and more stable and more prosperous than a society that is stratified into poor and rich, healthy and sick, educated and illiterate.”
  • In business we often suppress our emotions; many consider the expression of feelings to be a personal weakness. In “Humanizing Business Through Emotions: On the Role of Emotions in Ethics” (Journal of Business Ethics; 49(1): 1-11, 2004; www.kluweronline.com/issn/0167-4544/current), Yotam Lurie identifies the positive role of emotions in human judgment and attitudes. He believes that humanizing business by expressing emotions contributes to a more productive and humane business environment.
  • Staffing your organization is neither an easy job nor an exact science. In “How to Hire So You Don’t Have to Fire” (CIO; 17(10): 72-80, 2004; www.cio.com), Meredith Levinson describes a process for assessing candidates’ answers to interview questions to identify those who have the right attitude. The author also offers tips on how to get useful information from candidates. Although the article focuses on IT organizations, the principles apply to many other industry sectors. Even if you are an interviewee, this article will prove valuable, as it provides insight about interviews from the interviewer’s perspective.
  • Knowledge management is a key factor for competitive success today. In “Knowledge Management: A Tool for SMEs to Enhance Competitiveness (Tech Monitor; 21(1): 15-21, 2004; www.techmonitor.net), David Chesebrough discusses how effective knowledge management can improve business decisions and increase productivity, effectiveness and efficiency. The author discusses the ubiquitously networked environment, where information access and exchange is secure, reliable and seamless.
  • The relationship between a dog and its master may lead to some truths on learning, communicating and relationship building. In “10 Lessons on Leadership” (Educausereview; 39(2): 19-26, 2004; www.educause.edu/pub/er), Poley McClure draws upon an analogue between organizational leadership and the sport of agility with her dog. Learning, communicating and relationship building are the keys to success in agility. The specific lessons she has learned apply to success in “agility” as well as in organizational leadership.
  • During the technology boom of the 1990s, many virtual colleges and universities were created. In “Virtual Universities: Real Possibilities” (EducauseReview; 39(20: 28-39, 2004; www.educause.edu/pub/er), Rhonda Epper and Myk Garn summarize six major findings regarding the progress of virtual colleges and universities. They also discuss the implications of these findings for policymakers.
  • Charismatic leadership can often influence external support for an organization. In “Lend Me Your Wallets: The Effect of Charismatic Leadership on External Support for an Organization (Strategic Management Journal; 25(4): 309-330, 2004; www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2144), Francis Flynn and Barry Staw discuss the influence of charismatic leadership, particularly with regard to attracting investors. They found that the effects of charisma increase as situations become more difficult, even to the point of converting economically difficult situations into positive ones.

 

 

Back

 


Terrance Malkinson is a proposal manager/documentation specialist; an elected Senator of the University of Calgary; an elected Governor of the Engineering Management Society; international correspondent for IEEE-USA Today's Engineer; editor-in-chief of IEEE-USA News and Views; and editor of the IEEE Engineering Management Society Newsletter. Opinions expressed are the author's.

 

 

© 2004 IEEE