|
E-mail Today's Engineer
Reader Feedback:
Give
us a piece of your mind...
…On Ephemera for Engineers and Scientists (Feb.
2004)
Yes, yes, yes. I have some issues with technical articles and the
Internet. My fear is the ease with which the nature of an
article can be obfuscated, intentionally or not, to the point
where a non-reviewed article appears as though it had been
peer-reviewed. There are some online epositories to which
authors can submit "cutting-edge" papers that have been
submitted for review but not accepted elsewhere. This gives the
impression that the manuscript is quality, approved work, when,
in fact, it could have significant flaws. What's the point of a
review process if authors are dumping their unreviewed
manuscripts all over the Internet?
The IEEE could help by tweaking the rules for submitting papers, to
define putting a paper on the Web as the equivalent of
pre-publication. Once the IEEE accepts a paper for publication, it
goes into the IEEE database, which is not ephemeral. Authors
should post on the Internet only exact copies, with the IEEE
copyright notice. It’s hard to enforce, but without some
protocol, authors are free to do whatever they wish — especially when researchers want to get things out as soon as
possible and accumulate lots of publications.
— Dan Sebald
IEEE Member
***
…On Non-technical Managers (April 2004)
Non-technical managers are not capable of providing guidance to
engineers about technical matters as they relate to company
objectives, or of being able to recognize when someone with an
axe to grind is trying to “snow” them with a biased view of the
technological issues related to a decision.
— Robert Spooner
IEEE Member
Lemont, Penn.
***
…On Knowing Your Customers (March 2004)
Mr. Roman’s article can go a long way to help young engineers
keep great ideas off the scrap heap of history. The article
addresses a principal problem with the way companies
charter engineering work today. One of the lost-forever benefits
of old-school mentoring for months or even years was to open the
eyes of an open mind to reality. Lack of insight into realistic
project factors — call it “environment” — does as much damage.
— Bill Clark
IEEE Associate Member
Fort Wayne, Ind.
***
…On Hybrid Vehicles (April 2004)
Good article,
easy to read. To promote hybrids, it would be beneficial to provide some links
to federal and/or state incentives or tax breaks for potential purchasers.
— Jim Tysiak
IEEE Member
Palos Park, Ill.
***
…On the Virtual Workplace (March 2004)
None of the mentions the primary force opposing telecommuting:
management. Only the very best of engineering managers are
secure enough in their relationships with their employees not to
feel that they have to maintain control of their employees by
having them physically present. In fact, the more insecure the
manager, the more often you will find him or her turning up in
your office or cubicle for no apparent reason, just to make sure
you’re there.
On the other hand, one entrepreneur I know started out from the
very beginning to create a distributed company. His central
office consists of a secretary and him, a network of a motley
assortment of platforms, and a roomful of high-speed
telecommunications equipment. The rest of his employees — all
engineers — are located all over the world (he just hired them
in place and supplied them with bandwidth). His comment to me
was that he wanted to ensure that he got absolutely the best
talent in the world. He’s now a self-made multimillionaire.
But such examples are far and away the exception. In general,
anyone who wants to telecommute will have to first gain the
trust — and then the grudging permission — of management. Many
employees who have won permission to telecommute have only done
so after announcing their intention to resign.
Moreover, employees in remote locations are usually the first
targets of layoffs, since they are uniquely vulnerable from a
sociological standpoint. With the engineering job market what it
is today, unless the employer raises the possibility of
telecommuting first, it is probably a “career-limiting move” to
even suggest it.
In general, the “virtual workplace” will not materialize until
management is forced to accept it by job market conditions. This
is something that is unlikely to occur in the lifetime of anyone
working in the industry today.
— Dave Simmons
IEEE Member
Newberg, Ore.
***

|