|
High
Noon for H-1B Visas
by
George F. McClure
On 1 October,
the 195,000 temporary visa quota that has been in effect for the
past three years will revert to the original level of 65,000 visas
per year. H-1B visas are valid for three years and can be renewed
for an additional three years. In October, nearly a
million guest workers could hold H-1B visas in the United States.
This quota
change comes at a time when the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports
that first quarter unemployment stands at six percent overall
nationally; at seven percent for electronics engineers; 7.5
percent for computer software engineers; and 6.5 percent for
computer hardware engineers. Even so, some business interests
continue to beat the drums that we are in the midst of an
engineering shortage.
How Did We
Get Here?
In 1990,
Congress responded to a spurious prediction of impending shortages
of scientists and engineers by reforming immigration law and
creating the H-1B
visa program. At the time, this program provided for 65,000 guest
workers per year to enter the United States on three-year visas, which they could
renew for another three years.
Soon after, demand for H-1B guest
workers increased. In response, Congress increased the H-1B visa
quota, first to 115,000 per fiscal year in 1999 and then to
195,000 per year for FY2001 through FY2003. Employers were filling
the quotas annually
between March and May, and evidence suggests that poor
coordination resulted in the actual number of visas issued in between 1998
and 2000 going beyond the quotas.
The Employment Picture
Has
Changed
The H-1B quota
increases came at the end of the Cold War, when many U.S.
defense-related businesses that had once relied heavily on
engineering talent were downsizing, leading to many layoffs of
U.S. scientists and engineers. To make matters worse, the stagnant economy
has reduced Information Technology (IT) spending, which has thrown
thousands of technology professionals out of work. According to a
recent survey, the IT work force in the United States shrank by
528,000 positions last year alone. Many of those are highly
experienced professionals, whose skills are now being wasted, as
they move to stop-gap positions outside their field.
No
Verification Required
| “We
have seen numerous instances in which American
businesses have brought in skilled foreign workers
after laying off skilled American workers, simply
because they can get the foreign workers more cheaply.
[The H-1B program] has become a major means of
circumventing the costs of paying skilled American
workers or the costs of training them.”
— Former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert B. Reich, in
1995 testimony |
|
Except for
companies employing more than 15 percent H-1Bs — the 100 or 200
so-called H-1B-dependent firms — companies do not have to verify
that they cannot fill a job with a U.S. worker before filing an
H-1B application. The H-1B-dependent firms must attest that they
have not laid off any U.S. workers in the previous 90 days and
will not lay off any in the 90 days after they submit a Labor
Condition Attestation that supports sponsoring H-1B workers.
Conversely, non-H-1B-dependent companies do not have to search for
U.S. workers first and are not prohibited from laying off U.S.
workers and replacing them with H-1Bs.
Further, while
H-1B visas are intended for jobs that require degreed training and
should be issued to those with baccalaureate degrees or better,
exceptions are made for “equivalent experience.” As a general
practice, however, no one verifies applicants’ educational
credentials or certifies that the schools issuing those
credentials are equivalent to accredited U.S. schools.
What About
Training for Displaced Workers?
The American
Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA)
imposed a $500 fee-per-new-H-1B visa granted for training
displaced American workers when the cap increased to 115,000 per
year. The American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act, signed
by President Bush on 17 October 2000, increased the fee to $1,000
per visa. But this Act also exempted foreign researchers for
university laboratories and non-profits from the quota, and
retroactively increased the caps on H-1B visas from fiscal years
1999 and 2000, to match the number of petitions approved in those
years.
The training
funds accrued from the H-1B visas now amount to some $200 million.
But because of the way the U.S. Department of Labor’s Education and
Training Administration administers the funds, they have been
mostly unavailable for retraining engineers.
| H-1B
visas are not the only source of foreign skilled
workers:
The
temporary guest worker program is in addition
to a permanent business immigration program (EB visas)
that admits some 100,000 skilled workers per year,
with requirements that no U.S. worker is available to
fill the job, and that prevailing wages will be paid.
A
program for temporary intra-company transfers (L-1
visas) brings in executives and skilled workers for up
to seven years, with no quotas and no requirement for
complying with prevailing wages.
Another
temporary visa program, the TN visa, exists within the
North American Free Trade Act (NAFTA) and permits
skilled workers from Canada and Mexico to come into
the United States in response to a job opportunity. TN
visas are renewable for one-year periods.
|
|
Lower
Salaries Come at Taxpayers’ Expense
Economist and
Nobel Prize winner Milton Freidman has pointed out that lower
salaries paid to H-1B workers at U.S. companies amount to a
subsidy paid by the U. S. taxpayer to the firms that reduce their
labor costs this way, not to mention reducing the amount of
taxable wages for which incomes tax can be collected. In addition,
foreign students studying at U.S. colleges and universities
receive a subsidy amounting to the difference between the tuition
charged and the actual cost to provide the education. At state
colleges, state taxpayers provide this subsidy.
Significant
differences exist between permanent immigration — the historical
path for bringing in the best and brightest talent from other
countries — and temporary admissions with work visas. Permanent
immigration has helped advance electrotechnology, math and science
in the United States immeasurably; consider the work of such
giants as Einstein, Fermi, Sarnoff, Slizard, Steinmetz, Teller,
and Tesla, who came to America through the
standard, permanent immigration process.
For More
Information
This
year, IEEE-USA’s Board approved a position stating that IEEE-USA
strongly supports limiting the use of the H-1B visa at an annual
level not to exceed 65,000, with the income from fees for this
program to support training of displaced degreed U.S. professional
workers. The position and supporting background are available at http://www.ieeeusa.org/forum/POSITIONS/h1b.html
IEEE-USA
is organizing an Engineering Careers Congressional Visits Day to
be held in July that will carry the message to policymakers that
the H-1B cap should not be raised from the 65,000 in effect for
FY2004 and that better training opportunities and better career
safeguards should be provided for U.S. engineers affected by
H-1Bs, to avoid a domestic talent exodus that could prove
disastrous to U.S. technological leadership in the future. For
more information, go to http://www.ieeeusa.org/forum/H1Bcvd/index.html
The
U.S. General Accounting Office has been tasked
to survey the extent to which H-1B workers have displaced U.S.
citizen and permanent resident workers. The report of that survey
is expected in September — just before the H-1B cap falls.
See
former
U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert B. Reich’s related
comments.
The
U.S. Department of Labor’s Education and Training Administration’s
procedures for grant applications are available at www.immigration.com/newsletter/h1btechnicalgrant.html
George
F. McClure is chair of IEEE-USA’s Career and Workforce Policy
Committee and IEEE-USA's Technology Policy Editor.
|