|
Preparing
Effective Visuals
by Peter
and Cheryl Reimold
Good visuals can strengthen
your presentation tremendously, but unfortunately, they’re rare.
The keys to good visuals are to make them:
- Few and to the
point
- Big, so they’re
easy to see
- Simple, so
they’re easy to understand
To these, add one more
principle: Make the important visuals memorable so
your key ideas stay with the audience long after the talk.
Be Selective: Know Your Purpose
People often ask us how
many visuals they should use per minute of speech. They are
usually disappointed with our answer: No more than you really
need. There is no magical number; the true criterion is that
each visual must have a clear purpose.
There are only a few
legitimate purposes for visuals. They can:
- Get a difficult
technical point across — say, with a flow diagram or line chart
- Make a process or
concept more concrete with an example
- Make a key point easier
to remember through a strong symbolic image
- Make the structure of
your talk more transparent by listing the major points to be
covered
- Provide a prompt for
yourself so you don’t forget the next point
The last purpose is the
least legitimate; yet in many presentations, it seems the only
reason for most of the visuals. Imagine writing every word of your
presentation on transparencies and just reading the whole speech
off the screen. The more overheads you use as prompts, the
closer you get to this absurd extreme.
Decide exactly how you
will use each visual. If it doesn’t serve a legitimate
purpose, throw it out. Sometimes, you’ll end up with just three or
four visuals. That’s fine. Many presentations can be improved
dramatically by omitting half the visuals. For one thing, it
encourages you to talk to people, rather than hide behind your
visuals.
Choosing the Right Chart Type
Your material usually suggests a certain range of chart types, but within that range, you can have many
choices. The most overused chart type is undoubtedly the word
chart; the most inappropriate, the numerical table. Correcting
your habits in these areas alone may improve your presentation
dramatically without much effort.
Major Chart Types and
Their Uses in Presentations
|
Chart Type |
Purpose |
|
Word charts |
Highlight ideas,
problems, etc. (Pure word or bullet charts, without graphic
support, are weak. For major points, consider replacing them
with symbolic graphics) |
|
Numerical tables |
Bring together a few
important numbers (Number tables are very weak — always
consider replacing them with stronger graphics) |
|
Pie charts |
Shows parts of a total,
with ratios or percentages |
|
Line charts |
Show fluctuations or
trends over time |
|
Horizontal bar charts |
Rank many similar items |
|
Vertical bar charts |
Show changes over time |
|
Drawings or symbolic
graphics; “concept charts” |
Illustrate processes,
concepts, equipment, etc. |
|
Photographs |
Show buildings,
equipment, people, etc. |
|
Video clips |
Show actions or
processes, or complex layouts not well illustrated by one or
two photographs |
Make Text Big
and Bold: The 18-Point Rule
Audience members complain
most often about unreadable charts. Is there a simple guideline
for avoiding this problem? Yes: make typed text bold and at least
18 points. Anything smaller will be hard to read from the back of
the room. Also, when creating bullet charts, use short phrases
rather than full sentences. After all, you don’t want to turn your
presentation into a speed-reading exercise, or insult your audience
by reading verbatim what’s on the screen.
|
Some
Common Mistakes to Avoid in Preparing Visuals
- Don’t overuse
word charts. If you need several word charts, disguise some of them as “concept charts” by enriching
them graphically.
- Avoid tables.
People don’t have time in a presentation to read many
numbers. Also, after reading the numbers, they usually still
need to translate them into relationships. In
most cases, a bar, pie or line chart will show the relevant
relationships more clearly and quickly.
- Avoid
unreadable transparencies made by copying computer printouts
or other busy material. Instead, decide exactly
which portions of the original chart you want to discuss in
detail and use only those items.
- Throw out
unnecessary visuals for minor points. Using too many
visuals becomes monotonous. Often, an example will support
your point more strongly than yet another dull word chart.
|
Keep It Simple and Easy to Process: The Three-Second Rule
As much as possible, avoid
competing with your visuals for the audience’s attention. Anything
that takes them away for more than three seconds
constitutes destructive competition. Here is the “three-second
rule” for you to remember: if viewers can’t get the
main point of
the visual in three seconds, revise the visual.
You can accomplish this
revision in several ways:
- Cut out all clutter,
such as unnecessary grids, numbers and details
- Include only what you
need to make your point
- In most cases, replace
numerical tables with other types of charts, such as bar or line
charts, which show relationships visually
- On line charts, label
lines directly instead of forcing your audience to flip between
line and legend
Using Symbolic Images as Layout Elements
On the simplest level,
symbolic images can serve as a basis for a layout that avoids the
standard bullet format. The chart is still a basic list, but its
character is disguised to give the audience a break from the
tedium of bullets.
This standard bullet chart,
for example, will probably wash right over your audience:
The same content arranged
around a star symbol that expresses the speaker’s “star presence”
will get much more attention.
Using Symbolization To Produce Memorable Visuals
Symbolization is the skill
of finding symbolic images for the concepts you want to express.
For instance, we wanted to illustrate the idea that the key to
powerful delivery is connection with the audience. A
natural image for connection was that of a plug connected
to an extension cord so that power could flow. It was simply a
matter of asking: Where do power connections occur? In the realm
of everyday household objects, plugs and extension cords
immediately offered themselves. Furthermore, the cliché “plugged
in” seemed ready-made for the purpose, leading to the symbolic
chart below:
This is one situation in
which clichés can actually be useful. Here are some examples to
get your thinking going:
|
Cliché |
Possible
Application |
|
Taking a swing at …
(bureaucracy, corruption, etc.) |
Business person swinging
baseball bat; background or stadium elements can be labeled to
denote the target. |
|
Obstacle course |
Show one, with obstacles
labeled to express the issues to be addressed. |
|
Bull in a china shop |
Show things being broken —
label them as appropriate. |
|
Dog fight |
Dogs fighting over bone;
label dogs as needed — e.g., Accounting and Production |
|
Take off like a rocket |
Show it; label the rocket
with the concept you’re interested in. |
|
Blind to danger |
Blindfolded person and
some peril (truck, manhole, etc.); danger may be labeled as
appropriate. |
|
Building blocks |
Show some; label them as
needed. |
A Caveat
By definition, a memorable
visual draws attention to itself — and therefore away from you.
Isn’t that just the sort of competition we urged you to avoid?
Yes, and that’s why you should be careful not to overdo it.
Besides losing your audience to your graphics, you risk getting a
reputation as someone who likes to play on the computer instead of
working on real problems. Consider a special visual only for your
main message or the most important key point — and even then only
if the ideas naturally lend themselves to strong symbolic
representation. In other words, build the skill, but use it
sparingly.

Cheryl and
Peter Reimold have taught communication skills to engineers,
scientists, and businesspeople for 18 years. Visit their new
educational web site at
www.allaboutcommunication.com.
This
article was excerpted from The Short Road to Great
Presentations, by Peter and Cheryl Reimold. It is available
from Wiley-IEEE Press (2003); price: $33.95 members, $39.95
non-members.
|